Stochastic Approximations and the Riemann Hypothesis: A Probabilistic Nyman-Beurling Framework

Download Full Article

This article is available as a downloadable PDF with complete code listings and syntax highlighting.

Executive Summary

The research paper arXiv:1805.06733 introduces a transformative probabilistic framework for addressing the Riemann Hypothesis (RH) by extending the classical Nyman-Beurling criterion. Traditionally, the Nyman-Beurling theorem relates the RH to the density of a specific subspace of functions in the Hilbert space L²(0, ∞). The source paper generalizes this by replacing deterministic scaling factors with sequences of random variables Z_k,n. The key insight of this approach is the formulation of the Probabilistic Nyman-Beurling (pNB) criterion, which demonstrates that the RH is equivalent to the possibility of approximating the characteristic function χ(t) of the interval (0, 1) using expectations of random fractional parts.

This analysis provides a rigorous foundation for using stochastic processes to probe the analytic behavior of the Riemann zeta function ζ(s). By establishing bounds on the approximation distance in a weighted Hilbert space, the paper suggests that the variance and distribution of these random variables are intrinsically linked to the zero-free region of the zeta function. This approach is promising because it allows for the application of concentration inequalities and moment estimates to a domain traditionally dominated by hard analytic number theory, providing a "smoothing" effect that may bypass the technical hurdles of deterministic approximations.

Introduction

The Riemann Hypothesis remains the most profound unsolved problem in mathematics, asserting that all non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function ζ(s) lie on the critical line where the real part of s is 1/2. Among the various equivalent formulations, the Nyman-Beurling criterion stands out for translating the location of zeros into a problem of functional approximation. It posits that RH is true if and only if the characteristic function χ(t) can be approximated arbitrarily well by linear combinations of fractional-part dilations {θ/t}. However, finding effective approximants has proven exceptionally difficult due to the jagged, discontinuous nature of the fractional-part function.

In arXiv:1805.06733, the authors revisit this approximation problem by introducing randomized dilations. Instead of fixed parameters, they consider random variables Z_k,n and study approximation using the expectations of these random dilations. This shift aims to exploit probabilistic tools—such as moment bounds, truncation, and distributional flexibility—while preserving the analytic backbone that links the approximation error to the zeta function. The introduction of randomness allows for the use of spectral properties of random operators, which often exhibit more predictable asymptotic behavior than their deterministic counterparts.

The purpose of this analysis is to connect the key structures of the source paper to the broader context of RH research. We isolate the Mellin-zeta mechanism, explain the role of truncations via maximum and minimum values of the random variables, and document how moment estimates enter the stability analysis. We then propose several concrete research pathways in which the probabilistic degrees of freedom might be used to construct sharper approximants or quantify rates of convergence.

Mathematical Background

The foundation of this framework rests in the Hilbert space H = L²(0, ∞), with the standard norm defined by the square root of the integral of the square of the function. The analytic bridge between this space and the zeta function is the Mellin transform. For the characteristic function χ(t) (which is 1 on (0,1] and 0 otherwise), the Mellin transform is 1/s. For the fractional part function {θ/t}, the Mellin transform is (θ^s/s)ζ(s), valid in the strip where the real part of s is between 0 and 1.

The source paper defines a generalized distance D_n involving random variables. Let Z_k,n be positive random variables. The core identity established in the paper is:

Integral from 0 to ∞ of (χ(t) - Sum c_k,n &mathbb;E{θ_k,n/t}) t^s-1 dt = 1/s + (ζ(s)/s) Sum c_k,n &mathbb;E[Z_k,n^s]

This formula is the cornerstone of the analysis. It shows that the quality of the stochastic approximation is intimately connected to the behavior of ζ(s) in the complex plane. If the approximation error tends to zero in the Hilbert space, then the Mellin transform must tend to zero on the critical line. This forces the term involving the zeta function to cancel the 1/s term, which is only possible if ζ(s) has no zeros in the region of interest. The appearance of ζ(s) is unavoidable: the probabilistic approach does not remove the zeta function but rather provides a new way to model the functions that approximate its inverse.

Main Technical Analysis

1. The Randomized Mellin Identity and Zero-Free Regions

A central identity in arXiv:1805.06733 is the transform of the generalized approximation error. When we replace deterministic dilations with expectations of random ones, the only "fingerprint" of the random dilation that appears in the Mellin space is the moment function s → &mathbb;E(Z^s). This reformulates the RH-adjacent approximation as a structured moment-fitting problem. If the approximation distance goes to zero, the finite sums of moments must approximate -1/ζ(s) in a boundary L² sense. If ζ(s) were to vanish in the critical strip, the right-hand side of the identity would encounter a rigidity obstruction, as the polynomial term cannot cancel the singularity at the zero unless the error remains large.

2. Truncation and Tail Control via Maxima

One persistent issue in Nyman-Beurling approximations is the contribution from the large-t tails of the integral. The source paper introduces truncations based on M_n, the maximum of the random variables Z_k,n. It establishes a critical inequality: the squared magnitude of the weighted sum is bounded by a term involving M_n raised to the power (2σ - 2), where σ is the real part of s. This mechanism is vital: it shows that keeping the growth of the random variables controlled prevents the tail terms from dominating the norm. The paper uses the change-of-variables identity to move the decay in t into an indicator constraint, setting up moment conditions that guarantee integrability uniformly across the critical strip.

3. Moment Bounds and Stochastic Stability

To make the approximation rigorous, one needs bounds on the moments of Z. The paper observes that for 2σ ≤ 2, the 2σ-moment is bounded by the second moment raised to the power σ. This monotonicity of L^p norms is crucial because a uniform L² bound on the random variables implies uniform control of the moment curve across the entire strip 1/2 < σ ≤ 1. The paper also addresses how to select random variables that emulate the "right" deterministic dilations. It introduces a variance-type bound V_n(t) which is controlled by the difference between the random variables and the target values (like 1/sqrt(k)), weighted by the magnitude of the zeta function. This captures the theme that randomness is used to build controlled approximants whose fluctuations are bounded in mean square.

Novel Research Pathways

Pathway A: Distributional Engineering of Gamma Kernels

The source paper suggests that random variables following specific Gamma distributions satisfy the technical conditions for convergence. A novel research direction involves optimizing the shape and scale parameters of these distributions to minimize the approximation distance. By treating the choice of distribution as a design variable, researchers could solve least-squares problems on a finite grid of the critical line to see which families of moments best reproduce the oscillations of 1/ζ(s). This could lead to quantitative lower bounds on approximation rates for specific distribution classes.

Pathway B: Concentration Inequalities and the Critical Line

The variance bounds in the paper suggest applying Talagrand-style concentration inequalities to the random sums. If the random variables concentrate sharply around their means, the probabilistic distance D_n becomes very close to the deterministic distance. One could investigate whether the rate of concentration is tied to the width of the zero-free region. If the concentration is sufficiently strong, it might force ζ(s) to be non-zero in regions wider than currently proven by classical methods.

Pathway C: Random Matrix Theory and Spectral Statistics

There is a potential connection between the random variables Z_k,n and the eigenvalues of random matrix ensembles. If these random dilations are interpreted as eigenvalues, the approximation quality D_n might correspond to spectral statistics of the matrix. This pathway would involve constructing explicit random matrix ensembles whose eigenvalue distributions match the Gamma-laws found in the source paper and investigating if the Montgomery pair correlation conjecture emerges naturally from the limit of the approximation scheme.

Computational Implementation

The following Wolfram Language implementation demonstrates a randomized Nyman-Beurling approximation prototype. It compares a deterministic basis with a randomized dilation basis and visualizes the resulting residual against the magnitude of the zeta function on the critical line.

Wolfram Language

(* Section: Randomized Nyman-Beurling Prototype *)
(* Purpose: Visualize the coupling between stochastic approximation and Zeta *)

Module[{n, Tmax, m, tGrid, wts, tMid, aDet, zRaw, aRnd, Xdet, Xrnd, y, W, cDet, cRnd, fDet, fRnd, tauMax},
  SeedRandom[1234];
  n = 20; (* Number of basis elements *)
  Tmax = 25; 
  m = 1000; 
  tGrid = Subdivide[10^-4, Tmax, m];
  wts = Differences[tGrid];
  tMid = Most[tGrid] + wts/2;

  (* Deterministic dilations 1/k vs Randomized Gamma dilations *)
  aDet = Table[1/k, {k, 1, n}];
  zRaw = RandomVariate[GammaDistribution[8, 1/16], n];
  aRnd = Clip[zRaw, {10^-6, 1}];

  (* Design matrices for least squares *)
  Xdet = Table[FractionalPart[aDet[[k]]/t], {t, tMid}, {k, 1, n}];
  Xrnd = Table[FractionalPart[aRnd[[k]]/t], {t, tMid}, {k, 1, n}];
  y = Table[If[0 < t <= 1, 1, 0], {t, tMid}];

  (* Solve for coefficients *)
  W = DiagonalMatrix[Sqrt[wts]];
  cDet = LeastSquares[W . Xdet, W . y];
  cRnd = LeastSquares[W . Xrnd, W . y];

  (* Plot Mellin residual: |1/s + (Zeta[s]/s) * Sum[c_k * a_k^s]| *)
  tauMax = 30;
  Plot[
    {
      Abs[1/(1/2 + I tau) + (Zeta[1/2 + I tau]/(1/2 + I tau)) * 
          Sum[cDet[[k]] * aDet[[k]]^(1/2 + I tau), {k, 1, n}]],
      Abs[1/(1/2 + I tau) + (Zeta[1/2 + I tau]/(1/2 + I tau)) * 
          Sum[cRnd[[k]] * aRnd[[k]]^(1/2 + I tau), {k, 1, n}]],
      Abs[Zeta[1/2 + I tau]]
    }, 
    {tau, 0, tauMax}, 
    PlotLegends -> {"Det Residual", "Rnd Residual", "|Zeta|"},
    PlotRange -> {0, 5}, 
    AxesLabel -> {"tau", "Value"},
    PlotLabel -> "Mellin-Side Approximation Error"
  ]
]

Conclusions

The analysis of arXiv:1805.06733 reveals that the probabilistic reformulation of the Nyman-Beurling criterion provides a robust and flexible framework for investigating the Riemann Hypothesis. By replacing rigid deterministic parameters with random variables, the approach introduces a degree of smoothing that allows for the application of powerful tools from probability theory, such as moment estimates and extreme-value control. The fundamental connection to the zeta function remains intact through the randomized Mellin identity, which couples the approximation error directly to the values of ζ(s) on the critical line.

The most promising avenue for future research is the classification of distribution families whose moment curves are rich enough to provide high-quality approximations while maintaining the tail control required for convergence. Specific next steps include optimizing Gamma-distributed kernels and exploring the stability of these approximants under controlled fluctuations. Ultimately, this stochastic signature may offer the clarity needed to resolve the non-vanishing of the zeta function in the critical strip.

References

Original Source: arXiv:1805.06733
B. Nyman, "On the Riemann zeta-function," PhD Thesis, Uppsala (1950).
L. Baez-Duarte, "A strengthening of the Nyman-Beurling criterion," Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei (2003).
A. Beurling, "A closure problem related to the Riemann zeta-function," Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (1955).