Open-access mathematical research insights
About Contact
Home / Erdos Problems / Problem #429

Problem #429: Is it true that, if $A\subseteq \mathbb{N}$ is sparse...

Is it true that, if $A\subseteq \mathbb{N}$ is sparse enough and does not cover all residue classes modulo $p$ for any prime $p$, then there exists...

Problem Statement

Is it true that, if $A\subseteq \mathbb{N}$ is sparse enough and does not cover all residue classes modulo $p$ for any prime $p$, then there exists some $n$ such that $n+a$ is prime for all $a\in A$?
Categories: Number Theory

Progress

Weisenberg [We24] has shown the answer is no: $A$ can be arbitrarily sparse and missing at least one residue class modulo every prime $p$, and yet $A+n$ is not contained in the primes for any $n\in \mathbb{Z}$. (Weisenberg gives several constructions of such an $A$.)

Source: erdosproblems.com/429 | Last verified: January 15, 2026

Stay Updated

Get weekly digests of new research insights delivered to your inbox.