Open-access mathematical research insights
About Contact
Home / Erdos Problems / Problem #301

Problem #301: Let $f(N)$ be the size of the largest $A\subseteq...

Let $f(N)$ be the size of the largest $A\subseteq \{1,\ldots,N\}$ such that there are no solutions to\[\frac{1}{a}\neq...

Problem Statement

Let $f(N)$ be the size of the largest $A\subseteq \{1,\ldots,N\}$ such that there are no solutions to\[\frac{1}{a}\neq \frac{1}{b_1}+\cdots+\frac{1}{b_k}\]with distinct $a,b_1,\ldots,b_k\in A$?

Estimate $f(N)$. In particular, is $f(N)=(\tfrac{1}{2}+o(1))N$?
Categories: Number Theory Unit Fractions

Progress

The example $A=(N/2,N]\cap \mathbb{N}$ shows that $f(N)\geq N/2$.

Wouter van Doorn has given an elementary argument that proves\[f(N)\leq (25/28+o(1))N.\]Indeed, consider the sets $S_a=\{2a,3a,4a,6a,12a\}\cap [1,N]$ as $a$ ranges over all integers of the form $8^b9^cd$ with $(d,6)=1$. All such $S_a$ are disjoint and, if $A$ has no solutions to the given equation, then $A$ must omit at least two elements of $S_a$ when $a\leq N/12$ and at least one element of $S_a$ when $N/12<a\leq N/6$, and an elementary calculation concludes the proof.

Stijn Cambie and Wouter van Doorn have noted that, if we allow solutions to this equation with non-distinct $b_i$, then the size of the maximal set is at most $N/2$. Indeed, this is the classical threshold for the existence of some distinct $a,b\in A$ such that $a\mid b$.

See also [302] and [327].

Source: erdosproblems.com/301 | Last verified: January 14, 2026

Stay Updated

Get weekly digests of new research insights delivered to your inbox.